Our Brains Struggle to Process This Much Stress
Our Brains Struggle to Process This Much Stress
Many people reach a point in their lives where they see clutter and excessive personal possessions for what they are: distractions and time-sinks that deeply – and negatively – impact one’s life. Minimalism seeks to change this.
I am no different; I, too, have been conscious that for many years I have amassed a vast number of gadgets, had far more clothing than I could ever really wear (before it went seriously out of fashion), and bought books far quicker than I could read them. Freely, I admit, I still do the latter – but I can “hide” them now on my ebook reader!
It is amusing to see, particularly on certain social networks, how minimalism is portrayed. Let’s describe a typically “minimalist” image:
For an example, check out Jessica Comingore’s minimalist studio.
If you Google this, no doubt you will see a definition along the lines of styles in art, music or design. But these days, “minimalism” has come to mean something else: the removal of superfluous possessions leading to a perceived reduction of stress and distraction in a person’s life. It’s this definition what I am most interested in, which is the one driving most internet imagery these days.
Minimalism is not, necessarily, about choosing to do without
Minimalism is an interesting side-effect of western capitalism. The effect of acquiring wealth is curious; it more often than not seeks to be displayed through the adornment of expensive garments, and through “showcasing” the necessity of owning various accessories, plus the outward demonstration of their worth to a “successful” person. But to many people, myself included, the effect of acquiring objects is that they increasingly demand more time from the owner in order to manage.
This is detrimental to their original purpose, because time will now be split between the owner using the objects, and the owner managing the objects. Thus, the fewer objects there are – whether these are clothes, cars, bottles of liquor in the cabinet, or watches – the more utility such devices actually provide and therefore the more effective they become both at their original purpose, but also as a showpiece.
Minimalism doesn’t, in my mind, have any connection with frugality, virtue through sufferance, or eco-mentality. To me, “being green” and “being minimalist” can be mutually exclusive, although they can also co-exist very well too.
Minimalism is not, necessarily, about choosing to do without. It is choosing to do with what you need, in the numbers your need it/them, and do without what you don’t.
Minimalism is also not doing without, for the sake of doing without. It’s a great exercise in making one reconsider what is important and what’s really important to you. This is the key. It’s justifiable to say that you need something because it makes you happy. Most people listen to music because, for their happiness and wellbeing, it’s needed. That’s fine.
Being minimalist does not mean sitting in a silent, white room, looking at perfectly pressed shirts hanging in a wardrobe. And it’s also not about choosing £20 shirts instead of £100 shirts. One can enjoy life’s luxuries, and one probably will enjoy them more, if their number is measured.
For example, just before Christmas I came to a difficult decision: I decided I had to sell my ThinkPad laptop. There were no two ways about it; I had too many computers adoring my house, due to accumulating older work laptops as time went on.
My thinking was, “well, it still works and it’s still powerful enough to do lots of stuff, so I can get more done by keeping it and splitting my activities between the MacBook Pro that I now use for work, and this.” Except that doesn’t really translate into the bigger picture. Sure, I could keep both machines and pretend I’m being more productive, but in reality I started spending more time wondering which machine to do what on, or moving data from one to another, or agonising that I was simply distracted by this entire thought process, or generally finding that the MacBook Pro was more portable and thus my preferred choice to take somewhere.
I historically associated my perceived productivity benefits to my ThinkPad, its wonderful keyboard, and loved how I had complete control over the GNU/Linux operating system I used on it. But in reality, two machines became a burden. Yet, this wasn’t the only laptop I had “laying around” (although occasionally used). Actually, I had four other laptops. This was akin to hoarding, and served no benefit whatsoever. There was basically no chance I would ever use them all until they broke, one by one.
So before Christmas, each laptop – an HP Pavillion, a ThinkPad T420, another ThinkPad – a T420s, and a Samsung Chromebook, all found new homes. They also found me richer – not only for the money I made on them, but also for the less clutter I had around the house.
Finally, the agonising dissipated and with that, the stress went. I had more space to think, fewer options to consider (as far as my computing went) and happier productivity.
Once you get the bug for selling or giving away old stuff, it is hard to ignore. As soon as I can find the time I will work on selling more computing kit I have laying around. And there are other things too – all sorts, in fact. Like old pieces of furniture (bin/tip), old garden tools (tip/sell), old clothes (donate to charity), one or two old TVs (!) … it goes on and on. In fact, the speed at which one can acquire goods is absurd.
Moving forwards, reducing this clutter alongside a renewed focus on personal development has already made a huge change in my self-perception. I feel stronger, lighter and more focused.
If this post has helped you, or if you have had similar experiences, please comment or link below!
I’ve decided I need to dance more in my life. Being a techy-programmer-web_developing-CEO-type, there is so little time anyway. With the remainder, I usually indulge in sci-fi, walking the dog, eating… and occasionally sleeping too. Yet, being almost an artificial intelligence by any reckoning, I can tell you that Androids are too busy to dream.
Well, this has to stop! No more sleeping! Only raving. It’s essential.
A trip to Miami is essential too. After all, you can’t be #superhuman all the time!
I am the first to admit that I am a product of the old guard. What do I mean by this? Well, when I started running a business in 2001, when the internet provided unbridled commercial opportunities and there was a scarcity of talent to develop for them, there was a certain modus operandi: keep your cards close to your chest. Shedding this behavioural axiom feels like the equivalent of standing up naked, in front of a live TV audience, promising them you really are still going to the gym and it’s all a work in progress. You can expect mixed reactions.
But in the last thirteen years, a lot has changed. We have seen the meteoric rise of internet-enabled devices and the framework, especially via social networking, for people to express themselves more freely. In fact, not just “more” freely, but FREELY, period. With this certain stream-of-consciousness we have also seen how businesses, once the “big blue”s of this world – hidden behind glass and steel, dictating the new world order – have become much more bottom-up, and even grassroots in appearance, if not in total nature.
I would argue that smaller teams in larger businesses will become more fashionable, because they tend to get things done more efficiently. The challenge has become less about the big wins, and more about how the small, inter-connected wins can be made to work well together. This, after all, was the original spirit of Web 2.0 (remember that?!). What Web 2.0 represented was the idea that instead of developing a monolithic web site or business platform which covered all functionality, you could actually interact with other sites and use them too. And they could use you and your services/data.
This is very much the case today. How many web sites do you visit where you can log in using credentials from another service/site? This flexibility and openness is not necessarily less secure, though some might argue against global logins – and there are good reasons to be cautious of this.
But, authentication is one of many possible services available on the web, and exploring this loosely-coupled architecture is becomming faster and easier than ever. Through a much greater spirit of discovery, we are bearing witness to an age of more open experimentation, more open discussion, and more open engagement amongst interested parties. Clients, friends, rivals, competitors. Finally, we can also celebrate the “failures” too. The increasingly scientific nature of modern thinking allows egos to be left at the door, and the excitement and joy of new adventures in technology to be more fully appreciated.
Many of us are into technology because of this excitement and enlightenment, myself included. It’s childlike and, IMHO, a desirable quality in a person. When you accept you are but one person, you accept a universal truth shared by everyone – and in so doing, acknowledge that while your time is precious, sharing whatever you can from it is a great investment.
On that basis, I am intending to up my blogging rate ten-fold, to try to document the events of my days and weeks and the challenges I face in them. My experiment will be to see if in doing this – i.e. openly blogging much more of what’s going on in my microbusiness, there is a positive effect on people around, the interest in my business services and, ultimately I suppose, a positive effect on me.
And I will be open about the result. Stay tuned!